As a species, we have a propensity to believe only in those things which are easily discernible to our senses. We tend to dismiss out of hand the existence of those things which are too small to be seen or not dense enough to be felt. The existence of microbes is only a fairly recent discovery, and air was once thought of in much the same way we now think of space. To primitive man air was 'nothing'. It wasn't visible. It offered little resistance to motion. It seemed to have no discernible attributes other than its inertness. They were mystified by the invisible forces of wind. Today, space seems to us to be nothing. You can't see it, taste it or feel it. Space propagates electro magnetism, but not sound. We are mystified by the invisible forces of gravity. Space doesn't appear to have any mass and it offers no measurable resistance to motion. It seems to have only one attribute - volume - which is actually VERY important. For if it wasn't for that single redeeming feature, the Universe would be a solid block of matter in a state of critical mass with nowhere to explode, and things would be really uncomfortable.

It is important to remember that most of the Universe is not material in nature and that which IS material encompasses a wide array of different components. If we allow our imaginations to be governed solely by our senses, we must conclude that space is but a single element - an inert ethereal sea devoid of properties. If we reflect on what we know and what might be possible, it could be that space is comprised of a vast spectrum of elements more numerous than those which populate the Periodic Table. And as our planet plunges through the endless sea of space, variations in the concentrations of those ethereal elements may have a subtle - but very real - effect upon our environment and our lives.

ANYTHING - material or otherwise - which has a presence within the Universe exists. Space and matter are two very different forms of physical manifestation. Space is ethereal in nature and matter is material in nature. Both exist, and the existence of an infinite expanse of space devoid of matter requires no less logical justification than would an infinite expanse of matter devoid of space.